The Minnesota State Senate today passed the marriage equality bill by a vote of 37-30, following four hours of debate. State Senator Julianne Ortman (R-Chanhassen) voted no on the issue. Only one Republican, Senator Brandon Petersen, voted in favor of the bill, while three DFL Senators voted no (Dan Sparks, Leroy Stumpf, and Lyle Koenen).
Governor Mark Dayton has indicated he will sign the bill, and a signing ceremony is planned for 5 p.m. Tuesday afternoon on the South Side Capitol Steps. Minnesota will be the 12th state to institute marriage equality.
Rumors were swirling before the vote that Ortman, who had been consistently opposed to marriage equality in recent sessions, may be reconsidering her position. At times during the debate, she was spotted conferring with Senator Scott Dibble, the bill’s author. Hanging over Ortman’s vote was the notion that she might be a candidate for higher office in 2014. Recent speculation has indicated that she may be looking at the race for U.S. Senate against Al Franken.
The Republican base is strongly opposed to marriage equality. Polling from January shows 79% disapproval among Republicans, which likely makes the path to endorsement difficult for a marriage equality supporter.
The marriage equality bill passed the Minnesota State House of Representatives today 75-59. Four Republican Representatives voted in favor of the bill: Jenifer Loon (Eden Prairie), Andrea Kieffer (Woodbury), Pat Garofalo (Farmington), and David FitzSimmons (Albertville), while two DFL Representatives voted against it: Patti Fritz (Faribault) and Mary Sawatzky (Willmar).
Carver County Representatives Joe Hoppe (R-Chaska), Ernie Leidiger (R-Mayer), and Cindy Pugh (R-Chanhassen) all voted no, even after FitzSimmons’s amendment to rename all references to “marriage” in Minnesota statute as “civil marriage”, thereby providing additional reassurance that religious institutions would not be impacted by approval of marriage equality.
As previously noted, voters in both Hoppe and Pugh’s districts voted against the marriage amendment last November so they are swimming upstream in this regard. Pugh’s vote is a distinct contrast from her district, as 33B voted against the marriage amendment by 17 points – -the third largest margin of the 21 House Republican districts that voted against the amendment.
[Picture of the voting board above courtesy of Leanne Kunze’s Twitter stream.]
The Minnesota House of Representatives will vote on H.F. 1054 — the marriage equality bill — on Thursday. The movement of this bill to the floor is a signal from leadership in the DFL majority that they have the necessary 68 votes to pass the bill, as Speaker of the House Paul Thissen has indicated he would not bring the bill up for vote unless there was sufficient votes to pass it.
In recent weeks, there has been substantial movement among rural DFL legislators towards the bill, including Hinckley’s Tim Faust and Crosby’s Joe Radinovich just within the last few days. With passage seemingly assured at this point, the interesting thing to watch will be if any suburban Republicans vote yes on the bill as well. 21 House Republicans — including Chaska’s Joe Hoppe and Chanhassen’s Cindy Pugh — represent districts that opposed last November’s marriage amendment. As of now, none of them have publicly indicated their support for marriage equality.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk says he has sufficient votes in his caucus to pass the bill in that chamber as well, but does not intend to bring the bill to the floor until after the House vote. Governor Mark Dayton has indicated he will sign the bill if it passes both chambers.
Ten states currently have marriage equality, and Delaware’s legislature is also voting on the issue this week (with passage expected).
Meanwhile, negotiations designed to produce a compromise budget between the House, Senate, and Governor are ongoing. As noted previously, untangling the three tax plans is likely to biggest source the most difficult challenge faced by the negotiators. With less than two weeks left in the session, the pace is likely to be rather hectic to get through all the necessary business by then.
Mike Frey, the pastor at Northern Lights Baptist Church in Waconia, emerged as the viral celebrity of yesterday’s hearings on the marriage equality bills at the State Legislature thanks to his colorfully inaccurate testimony in the House Civil Law Committee. Here are some key excerpts, where Frey attempted to argue public health concerns:
When there is ejaculation into a vagina, there is a barrier there, as in your packet it states there, of a cellular tissue that doesn’t allow the sperm — that has an enzyme at the head of it, to penetrate the blood flow. It is designed to go to the egg — that enzyme is designed to burn the outside membrane of the egg cell — go inside the egg, and then deposit the DNA. We call that conception.
When ejaculation occurs inside of a colon it is a highly absorbent material, the cells do not have a barrier for the sperm and those enzymes to enter into the bloodflow. When the enzymes enter into the bloodflow and a continued, prolonged, um, environment to that happens these enzymes into bloodflow it causes what we know as AIDS — acquired immune deficiency syndrome. …
There is an example in Los Angeles County, California, where among the gay community a rash almost like boils, and a very raw skin broke out on the hands, feet, butt, mouth of these gay communities and they couldn’t find a cure for it for a long time.
Frey’s medical information here isn’t exactly correct. Let’s set the record straight.
First off, the vagina doesn’t have a barrier that prevents HIV/AIDS transmission. In fact, because there is more surface area in the vagina and the fact that sperm can stay in the vagina for hours or days, women are about twice as likely to be infected from unprotected heterosexual sex than men are.
Frey’s California anecdote appears to be referring to an outbreak of community-acquired MRSA in 2005-2006. There’s nothing gay-specific about MRSA, as it most typically occurs in hospital settings, while other breakouts have occurred in places where folks live in close quarters (prisons and military barracks), and among folks who frequently get small scrapes and cuts (football players, for instance, are 17 times more likely to get MRSA than a person in the general population).
[UPDATE]: Sally Jo Sorensen at Bluestem Prairie follows the money behind Frey and Northern Lights Baptist Church.
[Image is a screengrab from MN House video feed]
The marriage equality bill, S.F. 925, had a hearing today in the Senate Judiciary Committee. State Senator Julianne Ortman (R-Chanhassen) was part of the party-line vote on the bill, with all five DFLers voting in favor of the bill and all three Republicans voting against the bill. The bill is now eligible to vote to the full Senate for a vote.
In the 2012 election, Ortman’s SD 47 voted in favor of the amendment, earning 51.4% of the votes. However, the results sharply varied from the eastern side of the district to the west. The eastern portion of the district, House District 47B, voted against the amendment (only 45.4% voting yes), while the western portion of the district, House District 47A, had 57.5% voting yes. It will be interesting to see if the dynamics in 47B play a role in influencing State Rep. Joe Hoppe’s vote. Hoppe voted in favor of the amendment last session.
The counterpart bill in the House, H.F. 1054, had a hearing this morning in the Civil Law Committee that will continue tonight. State Rep. Cindy Pugh, who represents northeast Chanhassen as part of District 33B, sits on that committee. Pugh is a solid “no” vote on marriage equality.
Last fall, there was quite a bit of talk regarding State Rep. Ernie Leidiger’s tax problems. Recapping quickly, Leidiger racked up $144,000 in unpaid taxes at his businesses from 2009-2011. After initially blaming Barack Obama for his problems, Leidiger quickly regrouped and took responsibility for his actions and pledged repayment of the remaining tax liability.
Well, being thousands of dollars in the hole with the state and federal government didn’t do anything to dampen Leidiger’s zeal for promoting his exclusionary social agenda. In fact, we find Leidiger’s name among the donors to Minnesota for Marriage, the primary group that advocated in favor of the marriage amendment that was defeated in November.
One has to wonder where Leidiger is obtaining the resources to repay his taxes and make political donations. His current Economic Disclosure Form shows no sources of income, nor any investments or property he could be monetizing for those purposes. This only serves to highlight the continuing need to strengthen disclosure rules for state legislators.
[Thanks to the anonymous tipster who alerted me to this information!]
It’s been another great year here at Brick City Blog. Readership continues to grow, up 2.5x over 2011 and we tripled the number of e-mail subscribers. As we prepare to flip the calendar to 2013, let’s look back at some of the best posts on the blog this year.
This year, the blog received a lot of traffic reading about the travails of State Representative Ernie Leidiger.
In February, we broke the story about Leidiger paying for a speeding ticket using campaign donations. This was the most-read post on the site all year, was picked up by the Star Tribune and Pioneer Press, and spawned complaints that led to $800 in fines from the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board and the Office of Administrative Hearings. Read it here:
But that wasn’t the only rough patch that Rep. Leidiger hit during the year. Leidiger’s business activities came under significant scrutiny, first for a series of lawsuits his companies had lost and failed to pay the settlements for.
Meanwhile, Brothers Office Furniture lost a lawsuit and was ordered to pay $7,500 in damages in April 2011 and still hasn’t paid up (Case 27-CV-11-11245). Per state law, such judgments are supposed to paid within 30 days. The plaintiff in this case has had to go to court to get a writ of execution in an attempt to collect from Leidiger’s company — as of yet, unsuccessfully, as the judgment is still listed as active in the state court system.
And, that’s not the only lawsuit the Leidiger businesses have endured recently. Judgments against Brothers Recycling & Liquidation ($32,389,90 from May 2011, also resulting in a writ of execution, Case 73-CV-11-4601) and Brothers Office Furniture & Liquidation ($1,415.28 from November 2011, Case 27-CV-12-3581) are also unpaid at this time. Total it up and you’ve got over $40,000 in unpaid legal judgments against the Brothers family of businesses.
Later, it was discovered that Leidiger had $144,000 in unpaid taxes here in Minnesota and a long history of unpaid taxes when he was a California resident. Finally, we were able to confirm that Leidiger had defaulted on his government-backed Small Business Administration loan.
Under the terms of the Patriot Express loan program that Leidiger took advantage of, the federal government guaranteed up to $450,000 of the loan. The final amount that the government ended up paying related to this default was redacted by the SBA.
What is surprising is how quickly Jelco Parts went into default after receiving the loan. SBA documents show that Jelco Parts, Inc. was considered in default by its lender, Crow River Bank, by July 25, 2010. That’s only 11 months after the loan was finalized (August 26, 2009). Typically, loan payments have to be delinquent for at least nine months in order for a loan to be considered in default (closing the business can also trigger a default, and documents from the lender in March 2011 requesting that the SBA pay off the remaining loan amount indicate the business was considered closed at that time.
And that still wasn’t all. In August, Leidiger made headlines for “getting loud” at a League of Women Voters voter ID forum at a senior living facility in Waconia. Leidiger’s conflict with the LWV was the catalyst for another significant controversy in the County this election cycle — the refusal of many Republican candidates to appear at LWV forums. This was a move we did not endorse.
What these four candidates are doing is demonstrating yet again that they’re not ready for the offices they seek. Apparently, the forces in power at the Carver County GOP are immune to the lessons of history. Just two years ago, they formally endorsed two challengers (and had a third refuse endorsement) to incumbent commissioners, saying that the Board wasn’t conservative enough. Those three challengers all lost, by an average of 10 points.
Just last month, the same group of folks that spawned these four Commissioner candidates backed one of 2010′s losers, Bruce Schwichtenberg, in a primary challenge against the Senate Deputy Majority Leader and Tax Committee Chair, Sen. Julianne Ortman. When the votes were tallied, Schwichtenberg lost by nearly 17 points.
The lesson to be learned here is that running further and further to the right — even in a conservative area like Carver County — is self-defeating. It’s hard to get elected and it’s even harder to govern if you’re only willing to preach to a smaller and smaller choir of true believers.
And we tested the claims of those GOP candidates — that the LWV forums were biased — and proved them to be utterly without merit. Fortunately, the good folks of Carver County largely saw through these charades.
Here are the six questions that were asked (not including the opening and closing statements):
- Considering the decrease in aid from the State, what are your priorities for Carver County?
- Carver has been a rural county. How do we maintain the rural/urban balance?
- The Carver County Community Development Agency (CDA) is responsible for community and economic development in the County. Please assess the CDA’s record and suggest ways that it could change its operations.
- Do you feel that the decision to underwrite $10.8 million in bonds for the Oak Grove City Center project in Norwood-Young America was the correct one given the current economic conditions and the significant opposition of residents?
- Are you in favor of keeping the Public Health, Land, and Water Services Department in Chaska or moving them outside of Chaska and why?
- The 2011 County budget includes a 1.5% pay raise for county employees. How do you justify this given the current economic environment?
These questions don’t seem “decidedly leftist” to me, nor do they assume a leftist world view. In fact, two of the questions directly challenge spending decisions made by the then-current County Board. All six questions allowed Republican candidates to talk about their vision of government and to advocate for the spending cuts they desired.
So what we’re seeing here from Messrs. Workman, Long, Beaudette, and Walter isn’t a legitimate gripe about the League putting its thumb on the scale. It’s an attempt to duck real debate and to only have to talk to those within the conservative bubble.
From: Feckless and gutless
The two constitutional amendments that appeared on the November ballot were a hot topic of discussion. We looked at Voter ID in September, and found it wanting.
A quick review of the numbers is in order. Since 2008, there have been about 150 convictions for illegal voting in Minnesota. That’s less than 0.01% of all votes cast in that time. Practically all of these convictions have been felons voting before their rights have been restored. Both the amendment and S.F. 509 are silent on this issue. As one’s criminal record status is not any of the valid ID cards, passing this amendment would do nothing to address these problems. …
Meanwhile, the Minnesota Secretary of State’s office estimates that as many as 215,000 registered voters don’t have ID that would qualify under the requirements of the amendment and proposed enabling legislation. That’s over 10% of the number of voters in 2010, over 7% of the voters in 2008.
We should not risk disenfranchising tens of thousands of citizens to prevent fraud that is almost non-existent.
In October we ran a guest post from Leanne Pouliot Kunze discussing her faith as a Catholic woman and why she felt it was imperative from that perspective to Vote No.
When I hear our young adults talk about this marriage amendment, it gives me hope. Many compare it to historical accounts of various civil rights movements such as slavery and voting rights. I truly hope its our generation of faithful Christians who courageously vote no and defeat this hurtful and discriminatory amendment, but if not, I trust it will not be long for the next generation to correct it and be on the right side of history.
It took courageous white men and women to extend human rights to blacks.
It took courageous Catholics to extend the Sacrament of Matrimony to inter-faith couples.
It took courageous Catholics to extend the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony to inter-racial couples.
It took courageous men to extend human rights to women.
And it continues to take courageous citizens, straight or otherwise, to stand up for the civil rights of everyone!
It is time for courageous Catholics and others to stand up and fight for the rights and freedom for ALL citizens to enter into a civil contract regardless of their sexual orientation. Our religious belief regarding homosexual acts should not interfere with our religious belief of justice, dignity of human life and Free Will of every individual.
Another important topic was the protracted process of approving state funding for a new Minnesota Vikings stadium. Our most-read post from that debate tossed the yellow flag in the direction of a half-baked, last-minute funding plan by the legislative Republican leadership.
The press conference where the outlines of this new proposal were sketched out was not confidence-inspiring, either. At times, the legislators contradicted themselves, and to say the details of what could or could not be counted as “infrastructure” as part of the deal were fuzzy would be an understatement. Team officials have been working for a decade to get a new stadium, and it’s only now — one day after legislative leaders State Sen. David Senjem and State Rep. Kurt Zellers said the session would be adjourned — that the “silver bullet” legislation comes out of the woodwork?
Zellers, in particular, continues to be a profile in political timidity on the stadium issue. After saying that he would let the legislative process play out and demanding that DFLers deliver one-half of the required votes — 34 votes — in the House, he’s gone back on his word. The bill moved through House committees as Zellers demanded, and Minority Leader State Rep. Paul Thissen indicated he had the required 34 votes in his caucus for the bill, meaning that Zellers only needed to provide 34 of his party’s 72 members to get the bill passed. Yet, he won’t move the bill to the floor.
Finally, another of our most popular posts of the year touched on the intersection of popular culture and politics.
The constant theme of the Nolan Batman trilogy, in fact, is about how all people need to act nobly, look beyond themselves, and take their society back. Wayne has an unfailing belief in the people of Gotham City and Batman is a symbol meant to inspire Gothamites to do the right thing.
In Batman Begins, Wayne as Batman — along with policeman James Gordon and assistant district attorney Rachel Dawes — challenge the corrupt Gotham City establishment. In The Dark Knight, Wayne/Batman hopes that newly elected District Attorney Harvey Dent can be the symbol that helps push Gotham into a new era, by putting honest and worthy people into the existing social structures and positions of power. We also see in TDK that the two boatloads of Gotham citizens don’t succumb to their fear and blow each other up as the Joker intended. Finally, in TDKR, we see this notion brought forward again as the entire GCPD — once racked by corruption — comes together to try and stop Bane. Multiple characters, most notably Selina Kyle and Deputy Police Commissioner Foley, turn away from their narrow self-interest and instead fight for all of Gotham.
Thanks to all of my readers, and the growing cadre of regular commentators who have made this a lively little corner of the internet. I look forward to continuing the work here in 2013 and beyond!
Every election cycle, we get the requisite story about Carver County’s long history of voting Republican. 2012 was largely a continuation of that trend, with Mitt Romney racking up nearly 60% of the vote in the County, and Congressional and Legislative Republicans winning re-election. But there were some signs that the “suburbanization” of eastern Carver County may be starting to make Chanhassen and Chaska look more like their Hennepin County neighbors than like the rest of Carver County.
Let’s start off with the U.S. Senate race. For the first time in recent memory, a Democratic candidate won the county. Senator Amy Klobuchar cruised to victory by a double-digit margin over Republican nominee Kurt Bills. Klobuchar won eight of the nine precincts in House District 47B (all of Chaska, precincts 3-5 of Chanhassen, and precincts 1-2 of Victoria), and tied with Bills in the ninth. Much of that has to do with Bills’s historical weakness as a candidate, but it also speaks to the kind of Senator Klobuchar has been. (Keep in mind, Klobuchar lost Carver County six years ago to Mark Kennedy). Klobuchar has taken a moderate, low-key approach in the Senate, focusing on consumer issues and taking centrist positions on civil liberties and foreign policy, as well as many business issues.
Another notable result was on the marriage amendment. If you look at House District 47B, the marriage amendment lost by nine points (45.4% yes vs. 54.6% no/no-vote). The weak performance of the marriage amendment (compared to expectations) in traditional Republican areas like Carver County can in large part explain why it failed on a state-wide basis.
Interestingly enough, this vote puts eastern Carver County’s legislators, State Sen. Julianne Ortman and State Rep. Joe Hoppe, squarely in opposition with a large block of their constituents (While Hoppe’s 47B voted solidly against the amendment, 47A voted in favor of the amendment, allowing it to win SD 47 with 50.1%). Both voted in favor of putting the amendment on the ballot, and Ortman fought back hard against allegations that she hadn’t been supportive enough of the amendment during her campaign for the GOP endorsement against Bruce Schwichtenberg. Will Ortman and Hoppe back off of their support for their party’s divisive social agenda?
Meanwhile, the Carver County Commissioner races continued to show trends began in 2010. In that cycle, the three incumbent commissioners on the ballot withstood challenges from the right. This year, with all five incumbents up for re-election thanks to redistricting, all five incumbents were victorious. Four of those incumbents fended off challenges from the right. Tom Workman was the exception, as he was the lone incumbent who faced a less-partisan challenger.
What does this mean? Is eastern Carver County poised to “turn blue”? It may be too soon to say that, but it does show that demographic trends are likely over time to make this area more competitive than it has been in the past. And Democratic candidates with the right mix of qualities can get a fair hearing from voters in these areas. Democratic efforts should be focused on party-building and creating the infrastructure to support and develop these types of candidates that can compete and eventually win in eastern Carver County. Klobuchar and State Senator Terri Bonoff are good examples of the sort of moderate candidates that would fit that mold.
[Edited to clarify a point on the marriage amendment, 11:20 11/13]
Let’s face it, the last few months haven’t been that great for Ernie Leidiger. His tax issues and rank hypocrisy on government involvement in the private sector have been exposed for all to see in the middle of a re-election campaign.
So how has Leidiger been dealing with these problems? By trying to keep his head down, staying out of sight, and trying to cruise to a victory based solely on the “R” behind his name. Even some local conservatives have been muttering about Ernie’s low profile.
His campaign website is an embarrassing shambles that apparently hasn’t been updated since January and still refers to his old House District number of 34A. He ducked the League of Women Voters candidate forum after his ridiculous behavior at a LWV Voter ID forum was exposed, leaving tomorrow’s Waconia Rotary/Waconia Chamber of Commerce/Waconia Patriot event at Island View Golf Club as the only one-on-one appearance with his opponent, Keith Pickering. Too bad that interested voters have to pay $10 to gain entrance to that event, as opposed to the LWV forum which not only was free to attend but would have been recorded for on-demand online viewing.
It’s almost as if Leidiger doesn’t want to make himself available to voters. While this may be smart campaign strategy given his propensity for foot-in-mouth statements, it’s really not the sort of behavior we should be rewarding in our public officials.
Leidiger did surface once recently, though, seeking to protect himself by using religion as a shield. Two weeks ago, Leidiger made one of his infamous campaign-season appearances at St. Joseph’s Catholic Church in Waconia to campaign on behalf of the marriage amendment. Classy as always.
The sad reality for Carver County residents is that there’s only one way to stop this sort of self-serving and embarrassing behavior, and that’s to vote Leidiger out of office. In two weeks, you have that opportunity and you should not let it slip away.