newtown

Gun control options are many but solutions are hard to come by

The elementary school massacre in Newton, Conn. Friday is apparently going to prompt actual Congressional debate over potential new gun control measures.  Here’s a look at some of the options you might hear about in the coming weeks, with some pros and cons of each:

  • Firearm registration:  Would require users to register all of their guns with the state.  Would facilitate tracking of guns used in crime, as well as discourage ownership of prohibited weaponry.  Would be relatively easy to avoid, however, and viewed as a serious abridgment of Second Amendment rights.
  • Owner licensing and training:  Would require gun owners and purchasers to be licensed by the state.  Most proposals tie such licensing to requirements for successful completion of a gun safety course including passing a proficiency exam.  Process would likely create additional expense for prospective gun owners.
  • Liability insurance: Would require gun owners to purchase liability insurance that would cover any damages resulting from illegal usage of the weapon.  Presumably, this would discourage the ownership of semi-automatic weapons because insurance rates would be higher.  Would make it much harder for lower-income folks to own firearms.
  • Additional screening:  Would subject current or prospective gun owners to more intensive screening of their criminal and mental health background.  Would likely prevent more people with mental health problems from obtaining weapons, but will never be 100% successful.  Also, could be considered a significant invasion of privacy depending on what steps are involved.
  • Limits on magazine size:  The Bushmaster .223 semi-automatic rifle used by the Connecticut shooter had a detachable magazine that carried 30 rounds.  Some have called for the limit to be as low as six rounds, but most proposals place the number at 10 or 12 rounds as the maximum.  Significant numbers of these large magazines still exist today (and would continue to after a ban), and one could expect a robust black market to develop.
  • Ban on detachable magazines:  Some have called for a ban on detachable magazines altogether, which would require rounds to be loaded by hand instead of the quick change process facilitated by the detachable magazine.  Similar black market issues would exist with this option.
  • Other limits on ammunition sales:  Various options could be in play here, such as limits on the amount or type of ammunition that could be purchased.
  • Bans on certain types of weapons:  Congressional Democrats have already indicated that they will be looking to reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban which expired in 2004 — this legislation primarily impacted semi-automatic rifles with certain military features.  Could be somewhat effective — for instance, the AR-15 used by the Aurora, Colo. movie theater shooter would have been banned by the law had it still been in place.  However, there were legal weapons available that provided essentially the same function.  As with some of the other options, a robust black market would likely exist, unless the U.S. were to undertake an effort like Australia did in the mid-1990s, spending millions to buyback banned weapons.

The key thing to note about all of these options is that there’s no provision here that’s going to be a magic wand.  Guns are and always will be a part of American culture.  Mainstream debate (on both sides of the political aisle) reflect the fact that no one wants to take away the rights of law-abiding Americans to have a firearm for self-defense and hunting.  To reduce the number of tragedies like Newtown or Aurora or Columbine or Virginia Tech is going to require changes across a number of areas of American life — not just or not even primarily changes in gun laws.  It has to reflect that our system for treating folks with mental illness isn’t working.  It has to reflect that there are some things very wrong with our culture.  Bob Costas may have used the wrong platform to talk about it, but we need to rethink our love affair with firearms and begin to treat them with the respect that they deserve.  Ads like this don’t help the process along:

Source:  Bushmaster corporation website

Source: Bushmaster corporation website

Featured image courtesy of the Newtown Bee.

5 Responses to “Gun control options are many but solutions are hard to come by”

  1. This is a tough situation. And like you state, not an ounce of gun control law will have any effect, whatsoever. I hear folks say, no mags, or smaller mags, but no mags isn’t going to fly and smaller mags only mean you have to carry more mags.

    We’d likely be better suited to look at better mental health regulations. Although it hard to say at this point, regarding this case. The misinformation was pretty high from the onset. I doubt there’s a national solution to this, despite the want of the federal government to try to craft effective all-encompassing legislation to prevent this type of behavior. If there were a magic bullet, that could be implemented federally that would make a difference, I think we’d have this by now.

    It’s just extremely unfortunate that these doorknobs should start with the end of their plan first, which is do us all a favor and blow your brains out first. No need to involve the innocent children, or adults in your mayhem.

    It makes you wonder if anyone has ever thwarted this kind of thing before the shooter went into action. Has anyone ever said, this guy is going to go ballistic, and the person is apprehended in the acquisition phase of his plan?

    • I didn’t say that gun control would have no impact. It may not completely stop these sorts of events, but I think we can reduce the frequency and severity over time with some properly-calibrated reforms.

      So, John, are you ready to invest some additional tax dollars to beef up our mental health support network?

      • I think each state should study its regulations and methods and determine if there are necessary adjustments that will be deemed to be affective. If the feds try to mandate something, I fear that a: it will take too long to implement, and b: be highly ineffective, and of course c: cost far more than it needs to.

  2. Also note that on the same day, in China, there was a story about a man going to a Chinese elementary school and slashing 20+ children with a knife. Sometimes, crazy just happens.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. What Are We Afraid Of? | Carver County Current - December 19, 2012

    [...] is a lot we can do, and there are people trying to do it.  Not all of it is good, and most of it is effort for effort’s [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 400 other followers

%d bloggers like this: